[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <200404052315.i35NFBEG025871@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu)
Subject: Training & Certifications
On Tue, 06 Apr 2004 10:18:10 +1200, Bojan Zdrnja <Bojan.Zdrnja@....hr> said:
> If that was the reason for not hiring the person, good for him then!
On the other hand...
> If you went to ISC2's site and go to Directory of CISSPs and SSCPs and read:
>
> "... ISC2 will continue to respond to any employer requests for (ISC)2
> credential holder verifications. Such requests must be in writing on the
> employer's company letterhead and a release signature from the CISSP/SSCP
> must be included in the request. "
Do you want to give much weight to a cert from an organization, when the
organization's *own* staff can't get that one right? (I mean, we'd not be
having this interchange if the original poster had been told that by ISC2, would
we?)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 226 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20040405/e91c07db/attachment.bin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists