full-disclosure - Wiretap or Magic Lantern?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1081358181.1217.6.camel@Stargate>
From: nodialtone at comcast.net (Byron Copeland)
Subject: Wiretap or Magic Lantern?

Yeah, I'd like to see this myself.

On Wed, 2004-04-07 at 10:52, Brent Colflesh wrote:
> | 2., The terrorsts are not stupid, they use strong encryption and there
> | is proof that PGP repels NSA.
> 
> Please disclose this proof.
> 
> Regards,
> Brent
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
-- 
"Save yourself from the 'Gates' of hell, use Linux." -- The_Kind @
LinuxNet
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20040407/d727d101/attachment.bin