lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
From: exibar at thelair.com (Exibar)
Subject: The new Microsoft math:  1 patch for 14 vulnerabilities, MS04-011

give me a freakin break people.... you guys complain when Microsoft doesn't
patch something, and now you're complaining when Microsoft patches
something....  I think that a lot of people just like to bash Microsoft for
any reason they can think of what's next, Microsoft bashing because they're
in Redmond, WA and you feel they should be in Texas somewhere?

   Do the world a favor and hide behind your precious little *nix machines
and *think* that you're immune to patching and security holes while the "bad
guys" happily take over your systems, one by one....

  sheesh.....sorry for the rant, but I DO feel better now :-)  I'll get off
my soapbox now

 Exibar

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Edward W. Ray" <support@...cman.com>
To: <full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com>
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 10:10 AM
Subject: [Full-Disclosure] The new Microsoft math: 1 patch for 14
vulnerabilities, MS04-011


>
> I use Linux, OpenBSD and Windows in my enterprise.  Linux and OpenBSD use
> the "1 patch for 1 vulnerability" rule.  Seems to me that MS is bunching
> their patches together in order to make it seem on the surface that
Windows
> has less patches than other Oses, therefore it is more secure.  CIOs, take
> note.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
>
>


Powered by blists - more mailing lists