| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <200404142021.i3EKLbgq023238@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu) Subject: Cisco LEAP exploit tool... On Wed, 14 Apr 2004 12:41:31 CDT, Paul Schmehl <pauls@...allas.edu> said: > --On Wednesday, April 14, 2004 09:17:56 AM -0500 Ron DuFresne > > All wireless traffic should be treated as unsecured, and pushed through a > > DMZ/encryption tunneled setup. Puttiing wireless AP's directly on the LAN > > is a major blunder. > > > Well, that really depends, doesn't it. We're doing IPSEC using AES for > wireless on a test network "IPSEC using AES" certainly sounds like "pushing through encryption tunneled". So yeah, you're doing what Ron said you should be doing. :) -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 226 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20040414/93fd5c40/attachment.bin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists