| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1082005660.1321.131.camel@localhost> From: frank at knobbe.us (Frank Knobbe) Subject: Cisco LEAP exploit tool... On Wed, 2004-04-14 at 22:38, Jeff Schreiner wrote: > This is true but from my experience with amateur radio an HF rig running at > [...] > Even directional tracking devices used by zoologists will only pick up the > [...] > Sorry about the extended discussion on RF broadcasts, the main point wanted > to point out was detecting a 802.11 2.4 GHz transmission from 7 miles away > would be almost impossible. Could it be that you are confusing transmission/receipt of analog signals and digital signals? In the digital world you can distinguish between 0 and 1 even in signals which could be considered absolute crap from an analog perspective. BTW: The FCC authorizes higher power levels for point-to-point connections. A quick Google search found this: http://www.dailywireless.org/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=1926 Regards, Frank (absolutely not a WiFi or ham or otherwise RF guy) -- Warning at the Gates of Bill: Abandon hope, all ye who press <ENTER> here... -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 187 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20040415/f7186d5c/attachment.bin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists