[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <407FA175.3010702@ameritech.net>
From: dbailey27 at ameritech.net (Don Bailey)
Subject: I think I have the new RPC Dcom sploit.
An obvious fake.
Everyone knows my code comes standard with a huge header, that
would take at least a day to read. Even for code such as this, I
absolutely *must* document the obscure 'L', 'O' and 'L' statement
in order to clearly exemplify my reasoning.
As the ominous (insert spooky music and/or shivers here) the_ut
recently lamented: "his code is always didactic". Indeed it is,
jimothy jones. Indeed, it is.
Everybody thank the number 943 and the letters E, P and S for
this hilarious spoof.
Happy belated April Fool's day, apparently! :-)
north_
>/*
>rpcdcom 5 remote LOCALSYSTEM exploit for winnt, 2k, xp, 2k3
>2004.04.15
>
>(C) northern snowfall & SUPERrell
>
>targets for EN, DE, EE, CN locales
>*/
>
>#include <winsock2.h>
>#include <stdio.h>
>#include <windows.h>
>#include <process.h>
>#include <string.h>
>#include <winbase.h>
>
>unsigned char requestBind[] = {
>'L', 'O', 'L'};//fuckingtelnet :P
>////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
>
>//#define abort(x) { printf(x); exit(1); }
>//#define lprintf(...) {xlprintf(__LINE__,__FILE__);}
>
>_______________________________________________
>Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
>
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists