full-disclosure - viruses being sent to list

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4091837A.7090505@cotse.net>
From: gurney at cotse.net (gurney@...se.net)
Subject: viruses being sent to list

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

John Lalla wrote:
| I have recieved two virus infected emails from this list in the last
| week. Is it possible to have our list admin run clamav or amavis-new. I
| can deal with them on my own, but list-wide screening seems fundamental.

Why is list-wide screening fundamental, exactly? This is a full
disclosure list, meaning people can and will talk about things like
viruses. If you've got something filtering out possibly "infected"
emails, you may very well have problems with false positives. I think
that we're all big boys and girls here, and I think we're all pretty
capable of running secure email clients (read: not outlook) and
antivirus software (for those of us that run windows). I think things
should stay as they are, let us handle what should be filtered and what
shouldn't be.

- --
Gurney Halleck
Who signs his messages thus:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFAkYN2IOf8kHY2OBgRAl+PAJ9jz+EBEC7y11UfLxFzt893htvGLwCfYp8w
iOwXxXjo9KIITJDSG1xhal4=
=FgYg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----