[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3AD1F04EDB516C4097168A9C08CFFEE60B532E5A@shawmail03.shaw.ca>
From: tremaine.lea at sjrb.ca (Tremaine Lea)
Subject: A rather newbie question
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Hane [mailto:dlhane@...global.net]
> Sent: Monday, May 03, 2004 1:35 PM
> To: Harlan Carvey; Schmidt, Michael R.; 'Ethan Vaughn';
> full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com
> Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] A rather newbie question
<snippage>
> While I think you have a point I also think Ethan has one
> too. It is important to remember that users are generally
> clueless and/or unconcerned with security. Of course I'm
> grossly generalizing but I think you get my point.
> Keeping in mind that the weakest link can be the average user
> is always a good idea. And who would argue with idiot
> proofing any system, computer or otherwise?
>
> So I think a little harmless joking amongst ourselves isn't
> necessarily all bad :-) After all, how many ID10T errors have
> you fixed in the last week ;-P
The question is, how harmless is the joking, really? In all fairness to
users, they may have a great deal of inexperience with our specialty... But
frankly, I also can't practice medicine, or law, or fix more than a very
general problem with a car.... This makes me inexperienced or ignorant (in
the dictionary sense) but hardly makes me stupid.
We live in a very specialized world, and it is the technical nature of
things that a degree of specialization is required in order to competently
and effectively carry out a designated task.
Tremaine
Powered by blists - more mailing lists