full-disclosure - Learn from history?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20040510235532.C12599@dekadens.coredump.cx>
From: lcamtuf at ghettot.org (Michal Zalewski)
Subject: Learn from history?

On Mon, 10 May 2004, Alerta Redsegura wrote:

> I wouldn`t say these are "bogus marketspeak equations". Risk Analysis
> methods rely on mathematical models starting from this fundamental
> equation /.../

I used this term only because the equation itself is extremely vague and
ambiguous, and thus can be - and indeed often is - used as a basis for
adding credibility to completely outlandish or outrageous claims. In the
field of computer security and risk assessment, the model is far often
misused or abused, than applied correctly...

Just like with buzzwords - there's usually nothing wrong with the
underlying term itself, but at some point, it is safer not to use it
unless absolutely necessary, or truly justified ;-) In this particular
context, I suppose we were better off without defining and quantifying
risk ;-)

-- 
------------------------- bash$ :(){ :|:&};: --
 Michal Zalewski * [http://lcamtuf.coredump.cx]
    Did you know that clones never use mirrors?
--------------------------- 2004-05-10 23:55 --

   http://lcamtuf.coredump.cx/photo/current/