full-disclosure - Wireless ISPs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <94885558.1084298904@[192.168.1.206]>
From: jworkman at pimpworks.org (Jeff Workman)
Subject: Wireless ISPs

--On Tuesday, May 11, 2004 4:16 PM -0400 Sean Milheim <sean@...eus.com> 
wrote:

> However there is also pop3s and imaps.

I make pop3s and imaps available for email users as well as the unencrypted 
versions.  When I tell somebody how to setup their account I tell them that 
they should use the SSL version, and since 99% of them are using Outlook 
Express there's no reason they shouldn't, right?  My mail logs show maybe 3 
people, excluding myself, that use imaps/pop3s, and I am the only user that 
uses STARTTLS with SMTP.

Apparently the users don't care, so why should we?

-J

--
Jeff Workman | http://www.pimpworks.org/nigritude-ultramarine.html