| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <200405120106.i4C16UWl015554@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu) Subject: Wireless ISPs On Tue, 11 May 2004 18:08:24 EDT, Jeff Workman <jworkman@...pworks.org> said: > I make pop3s and imaps available for email users as well as the unencrypted > versions. When I tell somebody how to setup their account I tell them that > they should use the SSL version, and since 99% of them are using Outlook > Express there's no reason they shouldn't, right? My mail logs show maybe 3 > people, excluding myself, that use imaps/pop3s, and I am the only user that > uses STARTTLS with SMTP. We just said "We're making it available for use on <date>, and we're turning off the non-encrypted version on <date+6 months>". Users will get motivated once they realize that failure to be motivated means that they *will* get inconvenienced a lot more than the inconvenience of reconfiguring their client... This of course isn't an option unless your user community is a captive audience (university, corporate, etc - you ISPs will need a different way to fix it).... -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 226 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20040511/cb08360a/attachment.bin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists