full-disclosure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <200405121459.i4CExx99028230@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu)
Subject: leaking 

On Wed, 12 May 2004 15:38:47 +0200, Felipe Angoitia <fangoitia@...dasoftware.es>  said:
> >Sounds like a good reason to *not* use certain MUAs to me.  Your choice,
> >after all.
> Not really, my entreprise choice in this concrete case. 
> And which MUA to use is not the matter now I think.

All the major MUA's except one are for the most part free of
"you have to use it because corporate says so" issues - Eudora can talk
to Mutt and Mutt can talk to Mozilla's mua and Mozilla can talk to...
And quite frankly, unless the MUA includes a groupware component
that doesn't talk a standardized open protocol, it doesn't matter
what you use.

Given the recent Novell announcement regarding the GPL'ing of
Evolution Connector, there's little to no excuse for using the
remaining one.

You Lotus Notes users are on your own, however. ;)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 226 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20040512/b91651b2/attachment.bin