lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <79D80D394197764997DC956801CABCEE03168B0E@ushem204.exse01.exch.eds.com> From: john.duquette at eds.com (Duquette, John) Subject: leaking Unfortunately in a controlled environment it's not always possible to avoid MUA's. Novell's announcement is good news in any event. However, if you do use outlook HTML mail can be disabled via a registry key. Create HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Office\10.0\Outlook\Options\Mail\ReadAs Plain Set the DWORD value to 1 > -----Original Message----- > From: full-disclosure-admin@...ts.netsys.com > [mailto:full-disclosure-admin@...ts.netsys.com] On Behalf Of > Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu > Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2004 11:00 AM > To: Felipe Angoitia > Cc: Full Disclosure List > Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] leaking > > > On Wed, 12 May 2004 15:38:47 +0200, Felipe Angoitia > <fangoitia@...dasoftware.es> said: > > >Sounds like a good reason to *not* use certain MUAs to me. Your > > >choice, after all. > > Not really, my entreprise choice in this concrete case. > > And which MUA to use is not the matter now I think. > > All the major MUA's except one are for the most part free of > "you have to use it because corporate says so" issues - > Eudora can talk to Mutt and Mutt can talk to Mozilla's mua > and Mozilla can talk to... And quite frankly, unless the MUA > includes a groupware component that doesn't talk a > standardized open protocol, it doesn't matter what you use. > > Given the recent Novell announcement regarding the GPL'ing of > Evolution Connector, there's little to no excuse for using > the remaining one. > > You Lotus Notes users are on your own, however. ;) >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists