full-disclosure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <79D80D394197764997DC956801CABCEE03168B0E@ushem204.exse01.exch.eds.com>
From: john.duquette at eds.com (Duquette, John)
Subject: leaking 

Unfortunately in a controlled environment it's not always possible to avoid
MUA's.  Novell's announcement is good news in any event.

However, if you do use outlook HTML mail can be disabled via a registry key.

Create

HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Office\10.0\Outlook\Options\Mail\ReadAs
Plain

Set the DWORD value to 1

> -----Original Message-----
> From: full-disclosure-admin@...ts.netsys.com 
> [mailto:full-disclosure-admin@...ts.netsys.com] On Behalf Of 
> Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
> Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2004 11:00 AM
> To: Felipe Angoitia
> Cc: Full Disclosure List
> Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] leaking 
> 
> 
> On Wed, 12 May 2004 15:38:47 +0200, Felipe Angoitia 
> <fangoitia@...dasoftware.es>  said:
> > >Sounds like a good reason to *not* use certain MUAs to me.  Your 
> > >choice, after all.
> > Not really, my entreprise choice in this concrete case.
> > And which MUA to use is not the matter now I think.
> 
> All the major MUA's except one are for the most part free of 
> "you have to use it because corporate says so" issues - 
> Eudora can talk to Mutt and Mutt can talk to Mozilla's mua 
> and Mozilla can talk to... And quite frankly, unless the MUA 
> includes a groupware component that doesn't talk a 
> standardized open protocol, it doesn't matter what you use.
> 
> Given the recent Novell announcement regarding the GPL'ing of 
> Evolution Connector, there's little to no excuse for using 
> the remaining one.
> 
> You Lotus Notes users are on your own, however. ;)
>