[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <200405132152.i4DLq31P028397@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu)
Subject: (AUSCERT AA-2004.02) AUSCERT Advisory - Denial of Service Vulnerability in IEEE 802.11 Wireless Devices (fwd)
On Thu, 13 May 2004 20:36:47 +0200, Gunter Luyten <gunter.lists@...or.be> said:
> > The model of a shared communications channel is a fundamental
> > factor in the effectiveness of an attack on this vulnerability.
> > For this reason, it is likely that devices based on the newer IEEE
> > 802.11a standard will not be affected by this attack where the
> > physical layer uses Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing
> > (OFDM).
>
> That might be possible indeed, but this confirms to me that this
> "vulnerability" is based upon radio physics rather than shortcomings in
> the CSMA/CA protocol.
What they're saying here is "We'll not be affected by *THIS* attack (the one
that transmits on 1 frequency per channel)". A moment's pondering will
show that all you have to do is apply the same attack to the 48 OFDM subcarriers
at once. In other words, just a little more challenging. (Remember, every
single card that does OFDM has the circuitry to handle this already on it).
So no, you can't take down an OFDM with a PDA that does 802.11b.
You have to get a PDA that has an OFDM-capable card. :)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 226 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20040513/199e05b7/attachment.bin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists