[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <200405131501.i4DF1O8i013870@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu)
Subject: Calcuating Loss
On Wed, 12 May 2004 10:42:19 PDT, "Gary E. Miller" said:
> long time ago never to conduct "business" from home. Do not expect any
> encryption to be a protection, the Feds say they have never been stumped
> by encryption.
Go back and re-read that report *very* carefully. What they *said* was that
for that year, there were no cases where they didn't get the information.
It's *quite* possible that in some case, they *were* stumped by the encryption,
but eventually got the info *via other means*. They may very well have been
completely stopped by the crypto on your VoIP connection, but you got ratted
out by the person you were talking to because the Feds offered them a good plea
bargain... ;)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 226 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20040513/4f8fd55b/attachment.bin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists