lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
From: krajicek at (Ondrej Krajicek)
Subject: Support the Sasser-author fund started

> > IMHO the data are routed through host CPU anyway, DMA is not as clever
> > to locate the proper file in the proper filesystem on the proper
> > volume and pass them to the proper network card. You're right that the=20
> > CPU does not have to process every single bit of each (?) file.
> > But this could be solved by used more advanced bus architecture
> > (PCIX or even something faster) and adding more CPU. Dedicated anti-virus
> > chip is a thing which I hope is not going to happen.
> Hmm.. let me get this straight - I can run something like SELinux and get
> snappy performance on a 700mz PentiumIII, but to get security out of Windows
> I'll need even MORE CPU and a PCIX?  What's wrong with this picture?

We are talking about on-line anti-virus scanning performance, which
is decided mainly by the troughput of the I/O bus and CPU

SELinux is about mandatory access control.


|Ondrej Krajicek                                                 (-KO|
|Institute of Computer Science, Masaryk University Brno, CR          |
|     |
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 185 bytes
Desc: not available
Url :

Powered by blists - more mailing lists