full-disclosure - irc over ssl

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <40B24EE1.9010508@insightbb.com>
From: ragingsolitude at insightbb.com (adam)
Subject: irc over ssl

	
		Just because they're using mIRC, doesn't mean that they aren't unix/cisco tech geeks.  
		Ever consider that they might have run Windows on their workstations at work?  And even so
		using the clients that have been ported to Windows might be an even worse idea because of bugs
		in the ported clients.  It would generally be a good idea to think about what you're typing to thousands
		of people before you actually send it. dolt.

		and Thank You!
		

>>
>> Unfortunately because of mIrc's reputation, some high management decided to have
>> use disuse it.... Great, especially since we are all Solaris or Cisco kids and
>> nothing to do with Microsoft based half compliant IRC stuff.
>>
>> So if you can get the author or mIrc extradited to some secret jail under the
>> Homeland Security policy, I wouldn't mind doing the beating up and medieval
>> stuff. I have some nasty shielded SCSI cables I could use as a whip.
>>
>> PS: Just for the "mIrc colors" invention that man deserves the "hungry lion at
>> the Colosseum" treatment.
>>
>  
>

If you folks was using mirc, then yer not the unix/cisco tech weenies you
think you are.  For there are a number of unix based irc clients available
that do not have as much bloat as mirc, which requires windows to run.


Thanks,

Ron DuFresne