full-disclosure - SSL compliant IRCd's?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20040525131032.1a2a5b7f@krankor.localdomain>
From: dsolaro at freenet.de (Denis Solaro)
Subject: SSL compliant IRCd's?

On Tue, 25 May 2004 12:18:05 +0200
Gadi Evron <ge@...tistical.reprehensible.net> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Seeing that usual "MS sucks" debate above with no real purpose, I got to
> thinking..

agreed..
> 
> SSL supporting IRC servers have been around for a very long time now.
> 
> There are a couple of implementations, and a few more private
> implementations.. some of which use an SSL tunnel on both ends (client
> and server) in order to get it working.

Well looking at xchat linkage, I've found that...

        libssl.so.0.9.7 => /usr/lib/libssl.so.0.9.7 (0x405df000)
        libcrypto.so.0.9.7 => /usr/lib/libcrypto.so.0.9.7 (0x4060d000)

And I remember compiling it with ssl support... just to test. 
so it might be needed in a big scheme somewhere.  I just don't know where.
Best place to ask then... on IRC itself. :)

-- 
Denis Solaro -- denis.solaro@...adoo.fr