| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu) Subject: Cisco's stolen code On Tue, 25 May 2004 11:28:19 EDT, Brian Toovey <btoovey@...global.com> said: > if whitehats dont audit the code, who will? I find your response more > ignorant. Whitehats won't go anywhere near the Cisco code for the same reason they won't go near the Windows code - even if they feel morally justified in peeking at the source code, it's still illegal to do so. So you need at least a slightly gray hat to even consider the idea - so only grey/black hats will benefit. #include <open-source-is-better-because-whitehats-can-audit-too.h> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 226 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20040525/0f6e9559/attachment.bin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists