[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <200405251658.i4PGwsWk010352@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu)
Subject: Cisco's stolen code
On Tue, 25 May 2004 11:28:19 EDT, Brian Toovey <btoovey@...global.com> said:
> if whitehats dont audit the code, who will? I find your response more
> ignorant.
Whitehats won't go anywhere near the Cisco code for the same reason they won't
go near the Windows code - even if they feel morally justified in peeking at
the source code, it's still illegal to do so. So you need at least a slightly
gray hat to even consider the idea - so only grey/black hats will benefit.
#include <open-source-is-better-because-whitehats-can-audit-too.h>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 226 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20040525/0f6e9559/attachment.bin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists