full-disclosure - Cisco's stolen code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

From: keydet89 at yahoo.com (Harlan Carvey)
Subject: Cisco's stolen code 

Valdis,

I sincerely hope that you do not presume to speak for
everyone...


--- Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu wrote:
> On Tue, 25 May 2004 11:28:19 EDT, Brian Toovey
> <btoovey@...global.com>  said:
> 
> > if whitehats dont audit the code, who will?  I
> find your response more
> > ignorant.
> 
> Whitehats won't go anywhere near the Cisco code for
> the same reason they won't
> go near the Windows code - even if they feel morally
> justified in peeking at
> the source code, it's still illegal to do so.  So
> you need at least a slightly
> gray hat to even consider the idea - so only
> grey/black hats will benefit.
> 
> #include
>
<open-source-is-better-because-whitehats-can-audit-too.h>
> 
> 

> ATTACHMENT part 2 application/pgp-signature