| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <200405261528.i4QFSbcm011867@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu) Subject: Odd packet? On Tue, 25 May 2004 22:35:25 +0200, Steffen Schumacher said: > However, as you said, no ISP, which has to follow rules and regulations in the > western world allows spoofing of or even routing of the 127/8 net. 1) There's no law or regulation that *requires* an ISP to not route 127/8. 2) The *source* of the packet was 127.0.0.1, and routing is done on the *destination*. 3) An amazing number of ISPs do *not* do proper ingress/egress filtering. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 226 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20040526/480ce039/attachment.bin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists