full-disclosure - Re: Cisco's stolen code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <200405262053.i4QKr2Q5014657@mail.soporte.cl>
From: rodrigo at intellicomp.cl (Rodrigo Gutierrez)
Subject: Re: Cisco's stolen code

The thread started because someone asked about how to obtain the stolen
cisco code, I see several options to answers that question, the most usual
would be "yes, I have it lets talk" the other "Since the question is stupid
and I don't have it, I will ignore his posting", what it seems a bit boring
to read is "no I don't have it, I'm a whitehat, if i had the code i wouldn't
give it to you anyways because of copyright laws and so and so" or "yeah I
would get myself a grey hat cuz is more cool", I think there is several list
to discuss copyright issues and of course tons of information in Google I
would personally recommend EFF's website.    I would kindly ask the devoted
Information Security Lawyers if it's really necessary to discuss this issues
in full disclosure?, and our mail list administrator if its liable to create
a side list to discuss this law issues without bugging all the people, in
addition I would like to comment that not all the list members are in the
United States and I would guess that a big part of them don't give a tiny
rats ass about what the copyright laws in the U.S are.

Regards

Rodrigo Gutierrez.-