full-disclosure - MS web designers -- "What Security Initiative?"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20040612111114.GF23309@mail>
From: david at vex.net (David Maxwell)
Subject: MS web designers -- "What Security Initiative?"

On Sat, 12 Jun 2004, Nick FitzGerald wrote:
> The MS Security Initiative is an utter sham.

Good comments about continued web-cluelessness omitted.

> At the outset of the Security Initiative the skeptics largely said 
> "it's a marketing ploy", but its defenders said "it will take time for 
> the real results to be seen".  As the weeks turned into months and now 
> years and little has been seen to have improved (and some very public 
> things to have gone backwards), it seems increasingly that the skeptics 
> may have been right...

For years, Microsoft has had a policy of announcing products that don't
exist yet, to cause customers to stop buying a competitor's product.
That's Vapourware.

Is it really any shock that they would want to prevent customers from
using more robust OSs and tools, by offering Vapoursecurity?

-- 
David Maxwell, david@....net|david@...well.net -->
Any sufficiently advanced Common Sense will seem like magic... 
					      - me