full-disclosure - MS web designers -- "What Security Initiative?"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <200406140040.i5E0eeeZ003204@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu)
Subject: MS web designers -- "What Security Initiative?" 

On Sun, 13 Jun 2004 00:11:50 +1000, Dave Horsfall <dave@...sfall.org>  said:
> On Sat, 12 Jun 2004, David Maxwell wrote:
> 
> > For years, Microsoft has had a policy of announcing products that don't
> > exist yet, to cause customers to stop buying a competitor's product.
> > That's Vapourware.
> 
> Hah - M$ is new at that game.  IBM did it for years back in the 70s.

IBM was even better at it than that - the acronym FUD came about to describe
the IBM tactic of telling customers that a 3rd party something might not work
within the context of IBM's latest "future direction" whitepaper. (Note that
these were clearly *NOT* product announcements, but were specifically "We're
going THIS way" statements).

Most of the time, the IBM salescritters were at least reasonably good about
only spreading FUD based on already-released future direction statements (but
I've seen the occasional forward reference to an upcoming statement. ;)

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 226 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20040613/443dc9e0/attachment.bin