[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <A16F9DC0E61ACF43AF708AC2D3BE2B0604136B@gracey.internal.compucounts.com>
From: chris at compucounts.com (Chris Carlson)
Subject: Akamai
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A43635-2004Jun15.html
Need to register, but it's no hassle.
I'd mirror to my server, but copyright blah blah blah.
Anyone have any more info?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: full-disclosure-admin@...ts.netsys.com
> [mailto:full-disclosure-admin@...ts.netsys.com] On Behalf Of
> james edwards
> Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 16:45
> To: full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com
> Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Akamai
>
> > I've just been told that it was a DoS. No details.
>
> Unlikely, Akamai is an overlay network & the root content
> node is not reachable.
> Akamai can in real time spread web traffic through out their
> global network of servers, diluting a DoS to the point it is
> not significant. It is more likely that the complexity of the
> overlay network was the cause. Last week it was a DNS issue
> and it seemed much the same this week. Provided you know the
> IP's of the content servers you would find they were still
> up. At least that was what I as seeing.
>
> Here is some info on Overlay Networks:
> http://nms.lcs.mit.edu/ron/
> http://nms.lcs.mit.edu/ron/#papers
>
> Dr. Andersons "Mayday: Distributed Filtering for Internet Services "
> is quite interesting.
> http://nms.lcs.mit.edu/papers/mayday-usits2003/paper.html
>
> --
> James H. Edwards
> Routing and Security Administrator
> At the Santa Fe Office: Internet at Cyber Mesa
> jamesh@...ermesa.com noc@...ermesa.com
> (505) 795-7101
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists