[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <40D437F0.5010209@egotistical.reprehensible.net>
From: ge at egotistical.reprehensible.net (Gadi Evron)
Subject: USB risks - working autorun example (fwd from pen-test)
Okay, just to put this point at ease, autorun.inf usage on USB drives is
possible. My concerns are of a different type, a BOF or a backdoor in an
SDK. Even simple usage of USB for different operational criminal needs...
Still, if the simplest solution (autorun) works (and it does...)... why
over-complicate like we in the security field tend to do?
Attached is a proof-of-concept as made available by mak_pen@...mail.com
for using autorun with USB.
This should work. As it was already released, I see nothing wrong with
relaying it again (with due credit) here.
I'd strongly suggest to people to read the (different) threads on the
subject on the pen-test list, a lot of questions were answered there.
Gadi Evron.
--
Email: ge@...uxbox.org. Work: gadie@....gov.il. Backup: ge@...p.mx.dk.
Phone: +972-50-428610 (Cell).
PGP key for attachments: http://vapid.reprehensible.net/~ge/Gadi_Evron.asc
ID: 0xD9216A06 FP: 5BB0 D3E2 D3C1 19B7 2104 C0D0 A7B3 1CF7 D921 6A06
GPG key for encrypted email:
http://vapid.reprehensible.net/~ge/Gadi_Evron_Emails.asc
ID: 0x06C7D450 FP: 3B88 845A DF1F 4062 E5BA 569A A87E 8DB7 06C7 D450
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: <mak_pen@...mail.com>
Subject: Re: USB delivered attacks (working example)
Date: 3 Jun 2004 15:03:11 -0000
Size: 6880
Url: http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20040619/beea2398/USBdeliveredattacksworkingexample.mht
Powered by blists - more mailing lists