| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <200406220145.i5M1jHr4029534@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu) Subject: M$ - so what should they do? On Mon, 21 Jun 2004 18:42:44 EDT, joe <mvp@...ware.net> said: > I am not sure I agree with the first thing. Actually I think it helps in > that it is easier for people to know something is executable veruss having > to look at additional attributes to see if something is executable. Which is why so many people don't enable 'show file extensions' and thus get bitten by the 'cutebabe.jpg.exe' attacks, right? :) -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 226 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20040621/8512f967/attachment.bin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists