full-disclosure - M$ - so what should they do?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <fdb3980a04062212184094955d@mail.gmail.com>
From: mohit.muthanna at gmail.com (Mohit Muthanna)
Subject: M$ - so what should they do?

like duh... have you _not_ heard of "edlin" ???


On Tue, 22 Jun 2004 09:04:37 +1200, Stuart Fox (DSL AK)
<stuartf@...acom.co.nz> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> >
> > How about changing the ".exe" convention?  Making a file
> > executable by it's "extension" probably causes a lot of
> > opportunities for problems, doesn't it?
> >
> > Also, the magic file names, like "CON" and "AUX" should go away.
> >
> 
> No way!  Am I the only person who still uses "copy con filename.txt" to
> create scripts and such at the command line?  Please tell me I'm not?
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
> 




-- 
Mohit Muthanna [mohit (at) muthanna (uhuh) com]
"There are 10 types of people. Those who understand binary, and those
who don't."