full-disclosure - Apology: Was Multiple Scanning Engines

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

From: randallm at fidmail.com (RandallM)
Subject: Apology: Was Multiple Scanning Engines

I do sincerely apologize for offending those who felt this was not the place
to 

ask such a question. I felt though that there was no better place then a
place

where the recipients were of high caliber and knowledge. A Google search
would

have only given me advertisements of "We're the best" type. For those who
through

kindness answered I thank you so much.

--__--__--

Message: 4

Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 11:29:38 +1200

From: Nick FitzGerald <nick@...us-l.demon.co.uk>

Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] multiple scanning engines

To: full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com

Reply-to: nick@...us-l.demon.co.uk

Organization: Personal account

"RandallM" <randallm@...mail.com> wrote:

> I looking for something that can utilize multiple scanning engines to

> place above our mail servers. Any suggestions?

Precisely how is this a security vulnerability disclosure issue?

Securityfocus has a focus-virus list and there are many other fora 

around the web for discussing "whose antivirus is best" type issues...

Please, no-one else reply to this _on list_.

-- 

Nick FitzGerald

Computer Virus Consulting Ltd.

Ph/FAX: +64 3 3529854

--__--__--

thank you

Randall M