| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <51151.198.162.158.16.1088541990.squirrel@198.162.158.16> From: eric at arcticbears.com (Eric Paynter) Subject: PIX vs CheckPoint On Tue, June 29, 2004 11:59 am, James Patterson Wicks said: > CheckPoint's interface is very intuitive and easy to use. Easy to use in a "Microsoft" kind of way. Last I heard, it does nice things for you like always allow DNS traffic through, even if you have no port 53 rule and a deny all policy. How helpful! -Eric -- arctic bears - affordable email and name services @yourdomain.com http://www.arcticbears.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists