| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <6.1.1.1.2.20040630202614.01d5f518@213.30.158.180> From: B3r3n at argosnet.com (B3r3n) Subject: PIX vs CheckPoint At 10:29 30/06/2004, Cyril Guibourg wrote: >AFAIK, a PIX can operate without NAT. Did I miss something ? Yes, NAT can be disabled on Pix. See the 'nat' command. Simply put the appropriate line syntax and it will behaves as a normal Firewall. But only behaves because no routing daemon, and Pix keeps managing packets as a NAT box, he just does not change the source IP Brgrds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists