full-disclosure - Web sites compromised by IIS attack

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <40E494C9.5070406@sdf.lonestar.org>
From: bkfsec at sdf.lonestar.org (Barry Fitzgerald)
Subject: Web sites compromised by IIS attack

Denis Dimick wrote:

>Did M$ write ftp.exe? If so then they "own" it, they own the sources and 
>all rights to the code. Redhat owns very little of the code you get on 
>there CD.
>
>Denis
>
>
>  
>

I think that the demarcation line for this is where money changed hands.

First of all, ftp.exe is a common example because the ftp.exe that MS 
has traditionally included with various versions of windows has text 
data in it's binary that's part of the BSD license.  So, ftp.exe is 
"borrowed" code, so to speak.

First, I'm all for Free Software businesses (anyone who knows me knows 
this).  But, once a company chooses to redistribute Free Software code, 
they "own" it for all intents and purposes.  The original authors aren't 
responsible for it because distributions can (and in many cases do) 
modify the code before they redistribute it.

Red Hat takes the money, they get the burden of support.  That's the way 
the model works.  :)

             -Barry