[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.43.0407020038130.3628-100000@parka.winternet.com>
From: dufresne at winternet.com (Ron DuFresne)
Subject: Presidential Candidates' Websites Vulnerable
On Thu, 1 Jul 2004, Jordan Klein wrote:
> > Anybody have any better ideas? We certainly can't trust the politicians or
> Diebold. Considering the results of the last
> > election the whole process seems questionable, like in Chicago
> > "vote early, vote often."
>
> IMO, the only way to have the best of both worlds (electronic voting that
> helps the impaired, and an audit trail) is to have them print out some sort
> of encoded bar-code receipt that is what gets tallied. When you vote, you
> immediately get two receipts. One to take home that gives you the name(s)
> of who you voted for, and the other is read by a counting machine that
> actually tallies the votes. The electronic voting machine that you use
> should NOT actually tally any votes. The bar-coded receipt that is tallied
> should also be a one-use code. That way, someone could run them through as
That's just reverting back to a paper vote process, why waste the time and
effort and expense to put in a bunch of calculators that preint up more
paper fed into another calculator? Might as well go back to punchcards
and either a hand tally or feed the cards into another calculator...
Thanks,
Ron DuFresne
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Cutting the space budget really restores my faith in humanity. It
eliminates dreams, goals, and ideals and lets us get straight to the
business of hate, debauchery, and self-annihilation." -- Johnny Hart
***testing, only testing, and damn good at it too!***
OK, so you're a Ph.D. Just don't touch anything.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists