full-disclosure - full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.60.0407051026350.11047@rosetta.temerity.net>
From: mohr at temerity.net (mohr@...erity.net)
Subject: full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com

The whole gmail flame war kind of pisses me off.  This *is* 
full-disclosure.  The people who state that flaws in beta software should 
not be reported here are being counter-productive to the goals of this 
list: release of software security holes to teh general public.

If you're worried about "script kiddie sleepers" on this list, perhaps (as 
another posted mentioned) you should rethink your subscription.  So-called 
script kiddies need access to this information if they want to learn how 
these things work.

Ethics are not an issue here.  We do not (AFAIK) advocate illegal 
activity, and if this information is used for such purposes, that is 
beyond the scope of this list.  Ethics are determined on a person by 
person basis and should not be applied to a large group of individuals. 
Your ethics are probably vastly different from the ethics of another 
individual on the other side of the globe.  Face it: this information is 
posted solely for release -- what is done with it it up to the end users.

In short: stop whining and go get a life -- put up or shut up.