lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
From: andrewp at IRW.co.uk (Andrew Poodle)
Subject: IE Web Browser: "Sitting Duck"




> -----Original Message-----
> From: full-disclosure-admin@...ts.netsys.com 
> [mailto:full-disclosure-admin@...ts.netsys.com] On Behalf Of 
> Bruce Ediger
> Sent: 07 July 2004 13:41
> To: FULL-DISCLOSURE@...ts.netsys.com
> Subject: andrewp@....co.uk - Email found in subject - RE: 
> [Full-Disclosure] IE Web Browser: "Sitting Duck"
<snip>
> At least in practice the unix-a-likes demonstrate more 
> security than the flavors of Windows, don't they?
> 
> I mean, where's the linux chain mailer to equal SirCam?
> 
> Where are the multiple linux worms to equal Code Red, Nimda, 
> Deloder, Witty, SQL Spida, Slammer, Blaster, MyDoom, etc etc etc?
<snip> 
> The evidence seems to suggest that Linux is more secure than 
> Windows, particularly in whatever ways cause susceptibility 
> to mass-mailers.

The evidence thus far does seem to "suggest" that linux and such is more
secure than Windows, but to that extent is that down to...
1: technical knowhow of the userbase tends to be higher, leading to the
correct updating, patching, firewalling and general confiuguration of
the machines
2: the %age of linux based machines in use, meaning it's a small enough
userbase that it's of a relatively low interest to those malicious
coders out there.

I'm sure that as the userbase of linux increases, and on average,
dumbs-down, so will the number of attempts at devising linux specific
trojans/exploits/viruses.

The nature of the linux OS means that it's likely that these will have
less impact than their existing MS counterparts.

Despite MS being accused of security through obscurity by not
publicising loopholes quick enough, it's ironic that Linux benefits from
a bit of security through obscurity due to it's relative small desktop
userbase.

Incidentally, I use both OS' regularly on my personal laptop (dual boot
Win XP Pro and SUSE Linux), although my development box at home is
Fedora Core 1, and I work for a predominatley MS consultancy and
developmenthouse, so you could consider myself well and truly on the
fence.

Regards

Andrew

--
Andrew Poodle
Consultant
IRW Solutions Group Ltd
17 Glasgow Road
Paisley
PA1 3QS

t: +44 (0) 141 842 1142
f: +44 (0) 141 842 1134
e: andrewp@....co.uk 
w: www.irw.co.uk

---------------------------------------------
IRW Solutions Group Ltd
IRW Platinum: Strategic Consultancy
IRW Focus Blue: e-Business Software Solutions
IRW Associates: Managed Services
---------------------------------------------

This document should only be read by those persons to whom it is addressed and is not intended to be relied upon by any person without subsequent written confirmation of its contents. 
Accordingly  IRW  Solutions Group Ltd  disclaim all responsibility and accept no liability (including in negligence) for the consequences for any person acting, or refraining from acting, on such information prior to the receipt by those persons of subsequent written confirmation. 

If you have received this e-mail message in error, please notify us immediately. 
Please also destroy and delete the message from your computer. 

Any form of reproduction, dissemination, copying, disclosure, modification, distribution and/or publication of this e-mail message is strictly prohibited.


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ