full-disclosure - Public Review of OIS Security Vulnerability Reporting and Response Guidelines

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33L2.0407080722190.14539-100000@bigiron.atistar.net>
From: stepp at atistar.net (Nigel Stepp)
Subject: Public Review of OIS Security Vulnerability
 Reporting and Response Guidelines

On Tue, 6 Jul 2004 rsh@...rect.com wrote:

> To add to the 'Nobody trusts the OIS or its motives', I have to state
> that those NOT in the US object strenuously to anyone in the US
> unilaterally legislating anything that impacts a system used
> world-wide, when the 'safety' being legislated is to the benefit of
> the US over the rest of the world's concerns.  US court rulings in
> the area of the Internet, copyright, email privacy, and individual
> privacy rights tend to go against the views and rulings in the rest
> of the world, making us leery of any US centric legislation, much
> less unilateral laws on 'Internet Safety' or security.

I have to add that many IN the US feel the same way.

> R.S. (Bob) Heuman         -         Toronto, ON, Canada
> =======================================================
>         Independent Computer Security Consulting
>     Web Site Auditing for Compliance with Standards
> <rsh@...rect.com>        or        <rheuman@...ers.com>
>                     Copyright retained.
>                My opinions - no one else's...
>    If this is illegal where you are, do not read it!
>

-- 
:wq