[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <82CB183EE984504CB89566128AEE6FD9343BDB@is6b>
From: PerrymonJ at bek.com (Perrymon, Josh L.)
Subject: Mozilla Security Advisory 2004-07-08
That's what I have been trying to entire time. But for some reason you can't
pass parameters to the file correctly.
Ex- The behavior of code red passing commands to cmd.exe.
But it doesn't seem to like that. However the exploit released on FD
mentioned visiting a shared folder.
What I was thinking was that this exploit would have to be multi layered and
have the ability to pass params. to the exe.
So far I don't see that happening.
My question:
What about the problem with IE still? They haven't attempted to correct the
issue or make ANY public announcements. I know they have enough holes but
still.
I think this problem showcases the great response by the Mozilla team to
correct issues and hopefully will help with the move AWAY from IE and M$.
JP
-----Original Message-----
From: Gary Flynn [mailto:flynngn@....edu]
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2004 8:28 AM
To: full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com
Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Mozilla Security Advisory 2004-07-08
Berend-Jan Wever wrote:
> The advisory mentions that combining this with a BoF can result in remote
code execution, but they totally forget to mention that formatstring
exploits, integeroverflows, XSS, SQL injection, etc... might cause the same
problems too. I bet they just read FD and didn't think for themselves. As
far as I can see, this bug allows an attacker to remotely abuse any
vulnerability a local program might be subject to, thus making any local
exploit a possible remote exploit.
It would seem that one would have to be able to pass
parameters to the file being called for these types of
attacks to be possible.
--
Gary Flynn
Security Engineer
James Madison University
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists