full-disclosure - Firefox 0.92 DoS via TinyBMP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <200407122335.10039.fulldisc@ultratux.org>
From: fulldisc at ultratux.org (Maarten)
Subject: Firefox 0.92 DoS  via TinyBMP

On Monday 12 July 2004 20:52, st3ng4h wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 07:14:02PM +0200, David Huecking wrote:
> > Hmm, very funny modified BMPs?!
>
> [snip]
>
> > So we see the true nature of this picture.
>
> This is precisely the point that almost everyone is missing
> completely (but still clamoring "it works on X, it doesn't work on
> Y"), and that Sapheriel pinpointed: the core problem lies in the
> Windows .bmp implementation.

Well, _if_ it does.  What is actually happening is that you load a graphic 
with a massive resolution.  Linking to a page with a 4400 MB jpeg isn't 
exactly what I'd call a DoS, but the effect sure looks like it though ;-)

However...  maybe I was jumping to conclusions too quick...
Since, for the record, Mozilla on linux doesn't suffer anything.
Or so it seems.

Maarten

-- 
Yes of course I'm sure it's the red cable. I guarante[^%!/+)F#0c|'NO CARRIER