full-disclosure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20040720100947.GK1558@suespammers.org>
From: rodrigob at suespammers.org (Rodrigo Barbosa)
Subject: IE

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Okey, from your question, I really think it is not your "boss", but you
yourself that has these view about Linux being unsuported.

Yes, IBM actually spent lost of money on Linux. They have whole teams
dedicated on developing linux. They ported JFS for Linux. They send
linux distrubitions (RedHat, SuSe, Conectiva etc) S/390 mainframes so
they could have their distributions running on Linux. These are only
a few examples.

All this information is easily avaliable. Please, do your homework.
Even if your "boss" doesn't do his, you should.

On Mon, Jul 19, 2004 at 04:57:57PM -0500, tshilson@....com wrote:
> They are talking to IBM and HP.  HP won't do zLinux, so that leaves IBM.
> But will they actually spend the money?  I think that they will eventually
> be forced to, but there is much wailing and gnashing of teeth.
> 
> > Fine. Have them talking to RedHat, or even IBM.
> >
> > Yes, I think IBM is a big enough player.

- -- 
Rodrigo Barbosa <rodrigob@...spammers.org>
"Quid quid Latine dictum sit, altum viditur"
"Be excellent to each other ..." - Bill & Ted (Wyld Stallyns)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFA/O9rpdyWzQ5b5ckRApheAJ4kdRxYcLOI1IoiOE1xmmPG7wQdxACglffj
t/tdrco+0+INoAv8Wu9ksIA=
=5m9M
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----