[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <40FD4D90.3080305@home.nl>
From: niekbaakman at home.nl (Niek Baakman)
Subject: New MyDoom or Netsky variant?
Bart.Lansing@...ls.com wrote:
> Niek,
>
> Symantec only updates HOME users though Live Update once or so a week
> unless there is something critical (and of course you can go to them and
> obtain new sigs more frequently, just that you have to go do it).
>
> This has nothing at all to do with the speed or frequency of updates for
> enterprise users. We routinely see mulitple updates in a day, in some
> "firefights" we have seen them back to back as close as 15 minutes to each
> other. As far as not using Symantec on a mail server, we certainly do, in
Perhaps their enterprise anti-virus suite.
Their corporate version, and home user version certainly does not
(haven't had the time to test corp. 9.0)
Symantec choses to ignore the less important viruses, and releases
a big update 2-3 times per week. Even not so wild spread viruses are a real danger.
Machines get infected with malware/backdoors, in turn get abused as spam zombies.
Of course one would argue only home users should fall victim to having their
machines abused by spammers, as corporate desktops are/should be protected
by decent firewalls.
But this lacks updating of the fastest growing market (broadband users)
is affecting others (have to deal with spam/virus).
So what do home and corporate (again haven't seen 9.0 yet) symantec users have to do ?
Manually retrieve symantec updates with scripts/task scheduler.
Most don't, and viruses have a 1 day window of opportunity.
> tandem with Trend. Let me ask you Niek, just what is it you use to
> protect the thousands of desktops you are responsible for?
Mail security: qmail with sophos/clamav as Exchange front end
Desktop: Sophos
Regards,
Niek Baakman
Powered by blists - more mailing lists