full-disclosure - OFF TOPIC: antisemitic troll

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <E924F679D556A345B865717377DCDFC4036F0641@ROKEMAIL.staff.ad.cqu.edu.au>
From: b.griffin at cqu.edu.au (Brad Griffin)
Subject: OFF TOPIC: antisemitic troll

Stormwalker claimed:
******************************

Quoted from this website:
 "This web site represents the effort of one person. I need your help to
offset the costs associated with site hosting and bandwidth usage. If
you  find this site informative please help by clicking here"

One man's opinion is hardly proof. 
*******************************

What a wonderful way to discredit a website that contains in it's
'intent':
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/intent.htm

/begin quoted text
What are your sources?   

Wire-services, international press, readers, etc, etc..... Exactly the
same wire-services used by corporate media. The information contained in
this web site is content that other U.S. news sources prefer not to
provide to the American public.

Why do you believe that the public should trust you as a news source
over more commercial sources?  

I don't believe that readers should trust any source of information.
Readers should gather information from alternate sources and use their
own intellect and judgment of the content to form opinions.  

My purpose on this website is to inform, to offer information.

Unlike corporate media, I believe that people are capable of  making
their own judgments, using their own intellectual ability rather than
been led around by the nose by "reliable sources" who claim to offer the
"truth".

/end quoted text

Your comment that 'One man's opinion is hardly proof' seems a tad inane
doesn't it? After all, the content of the site is *not* 'one man's
opinion'. It is a collection of articles from mainstream media agencies,
not one man's opinion. If you read the text you quoted, it says 'one
man's effort', it says absolutely nothing about 'opinion'.