full-disclosure - FW: Question for DNS pros

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

From: frank at knobbe.us (Frank Knobbe)
Subject: FW: Question for DNS pros

On Sun, 2004-07-25 at 13:57, Paul Schmehl wrote:
> For the last time, I have *already* done this.  With both a snaplen of 1024 
> and a snaplen of 4096.  It *hasn't* produced anything useful unless someone 
> thinks *this* is useful  (I'm using tcpdump on FreeBSD 4.9 RELEASE.):
> 
> tcpdump -c 100 -xX -s 4069 -i xl0 -p -w x.x.dump 'udp && host x.x.x.x && 
> port 53' (Our IP has been changed to x.x.x.x)

Paul,

could you please post some *payload* of these packets instead of just
the tcpdump one-liner? Perhaps that's why we confused about your tcpdump
output/usage.

Thanks,
Frank

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20040725/9a3c47d1/attachment.bin