[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20040731184233.GD499@localghost.muenther.de>
From: jan.muenther at nruns.com (Jan Muenther)
Subject: Automated SSH login attempts?
Hey Valdis,
> It's more likely that there's one version, making noise and very rarely finding
> a box with stupid passwords. It's possible there's another rare version that
> tries several stupid passwords and a few old SSH vulnerabilities. Is there
> *any* reliable evidence (even a single box) that appears to have been nailed by
> a new exploit?
Hm, as of this frauder binary, I have my strong doubts... looked at it, and
it's a plain brute forcer / banner grabber which is statically linked against
SSH-2.0-libssh-0.1. No magic visible, at least not in the given timeframe, and
my gut feeling is that that's it.
>
> I'll gladly change my mind, but it will take somebody actually finding a
> box running a *recent* SSH and had guest/test/and_so_on properly secured,
> and the attack *still* got in....
I assume in the aforementioned takeovers other factors were involved.
Cheers, J.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists