| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <410E85DF.1070609@twowaytv.co.uk> From: btyson-norrman at twowaytv.co.uk (Ben) Subject: Fortinet Firewalls Got that bit.. A lot of these recent vulnerabilites seem quite complex to set up content filtering rules for - does the audience really feel that you could really get that far on top of the problem...? Hard enough writing snort rules without trying to commercially distrubute it...? All of the audience, that is, except pretty vacant who has a rather more difinitive answer :-) I think you might have hit on something there PV hl wrote: > --On Monday, August 02, 2004 04:56:42 PM +0100 Ben > <btyson-norrman@...waytv.co.uk> wrote: > >> >> Anyone had any experience with these - they claim to be able to offer >> content filtering and there by detect malicious content embedded into >> HTML, as well as the usual deliver systems. >> >> Sounds interesting my only concern is how you would stay on top of each >> new threat... >> > Through automatic updates from the vendor. > > Paul Schmehl (pauls@...allas.edu) > Adjunct Information Security Officer > The University of Texas at Dallas > AVIEN Founding Member > http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists