full-disclosure - FW: Question for DNS pros

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.43.0408031139320.7637-100000@tundra.winternet.com>
From: dufresne at winternet.com (Ron DuFresne)
Subject: FW: Question for DNS pros

No, it was my hurried reading, I see now with a re-read you mentioned
window size.  If I understand correctly, the tcp packets are mixed in with
the udp requests?

Thanks,

Ron DuFresne

On Tue, 3 Aug 2004, Frank Knobbe wrote:

> On Tue, 2004-08-03 at 11:29, Ron DuFresne wrote:
> > I think Frank mentioned the packets being like 2048 in size, and this
> > makes me wonder if it's a tad more then mere recon.
>
> No, no, the WINDOW size (of the TCP packets) appears to be fixed to
> 2048. Total packet size is 64 bytes (40 header, 24 null payload). Sorry
> if that wasn't clear.
>
> Regards,
> Frank
>
>
>
>

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Cutting the space budget really restores my faith in humanity.  It
eliminates dreams, goals, and ideals and lets us get straight to the
business of hate, debauchery, and self-annihilation." -- Johnny Hart
	***testing, only testing, and damn good at it too!***

OK, so you're a Ph.D.  Just don't touch anything.