[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <343561e904080310212280a328@mail.gmail.com>
From: abaker at gmail.com (ASB)
Subject: Netscreen 5GT Plus vs Fortigate-60
Thanks for the feedback.
Fortigate appears to be an up-and-coming vendor, and it sure doesn't
hurt that their founder is an ex-netscreen founder/exec...
I've only seen a few negative comments, as previously mentioned, but
nothing of substance.
-ASB
On Tue, 3 Aug 2004 17:49:16 +0200, Oliver Heinz --- arago AG
<heinz@...go.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have used Netscreen and Fortigate.
> You can contact me at the address below.
>
> In general: I would rate the two quite similar, except for the
> virus-scanning. Anti-Virus of the FGT is much better than in the NS 5.
>
> Regards, Oliver Heinz
>
>
> On Tue, 3 Aug 2004, ASB wrote:
>
> > Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2004 11:22:05 -0400
> > From: ASB <abaker@...il.com>
> > To: full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com
> > Subject: [Full-Disclosure] Netscreen 5GT Plus vs Fortigate-60
>
>
> >
> > Does anyone who has used both of the devices listed above, with the
> > latest firmware, have any information regarding the configuration of
> > policies of the latter vs the former?
> >
> > I've seen the demo at http://www.fortinet.com/demo but I'm looking for
> > real-world info regarding the effectiveness of the policies of the
> > Fortigate. I've heard negative commentaries, but nothing that has
> > been substantiated to any degree.
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists