full-disclosure - FW: Question for DNS pros

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.43.0408032311140.23269-100000@parka.winternet.com>
From: dufresne at winternet.com (Ron DuFresne)
Subject: FW: Question for DNS pros

	[SNIP]

>
> Perhaps the only solution is to build a list of 3DNS IP addresses and
> ignore these type alerts from those addresses.
>
> Thought anyone? (If anyone is still following ... :)
>


Still following here...

adding oneself to the list John mentioned might be the eaisier tack in
this situation, and make it so one is not hit by new implimentations, as
long as BIG-IP sites are not able to configure themselves out of the
do-not-probe listing as well;

<John Hall>
3-DNS does maintain a "do-not-probe" list to which you can be added, if
the 3-DNS's probe traffic is too obnoxious for you.
</John Hall>

Though, I must admit, I'm none to fond of opt-outs rather than opt-ins.

Thanks,

Ron DuFresne
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Cutting the space budget really restores my faith in humanity.  It
eliminates dreams, goals, and ideals and lets us get straight to the
business of hate, debauchery, and self-annihilation." -- Johnny Hart
	***testing, only testing, and damn good at it too!***

OK, so you're a Ph.D.  Just don't touch anything.