full-disclosure - FW: Question for DNS pros

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0408041430320.15690@catbert.rellim.com>
From: gem at rellim.com (Gary E. Miller)
Subject: FW: Question for DNS pros

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Yo John!

On Wed, 4 Aug 2004, John Hall wrote:

> Just about any response is useful for RTT/reachability measurement as long
> as we can associate it back to the correct probe.

My name servers are not even in the same state or AS as my
dialups and colos. So RTT measurement to my DNS servers is useless
to get info about the rest of my network.

I often hear complaints about the perverseness of global load balancing
using DNS queries.

RGDS
GARY
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary E. Miller Rellim 20340 Empire Blvd, Suite E-3, Bend, OR 97701
	gem@...lim.com  Tel:+1(541)382-8588 Fax: +1(541)382-8676

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFBEVZV8KZibdeR3qURAvJjAJ9Bg73e7XkR+yMPijBXmMvzlIi5FwCgw32p
Jlla1PIZzlavaOwezTeg2Ys=
=cL1c
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----