full-disclosure - lame b!tching about xpsp2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <013401c4818d$a9819470$0b38ba0a@corp.ad.timeinc.com>
From: jlevitsk at joshie.com (Joshua Levitsky)
Subject: lame b!tching about xpsp2

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "James Patterson Wicks" <pwicks@...gen.com>
Sent: Friday, August 13, 2004 5:22 PM

> All references to command-line were in direct reference to
> Devis' comment " . . nothing more and shows how the typical M$ user is
> scared as hell of having ever one day to learn Unix, go through RFCs (
> what for ? M$ don't even read em themselves ), and use the command
> line."

And they should not have to any more than someone should need to understand 
how their car or dish washer works. These devices should serve their 
function without needing to know in-depth how they work. Sure there will be 
experts just like you have mechanics and home appliance repair people, but 
thinking that a lawyer should need to know command line or what an RFC is... 
well that's just foolish.  Do you know how to rebuild your car engine when 
150,000 miles comes around and you need to do it? Or do you send it off to 
be rebuilt by experts?

--
Joshua Levitsky, MCSE, CISSP
System Engineer
http://www.foist.org/
[5957 F27C 9C71 E9A7 274A 0447 C9B9 75A4 9B41 D4D1]